В некоторых рукописях (например, XI в., Bodl. Crom. gr. 13) «Точного изложения православной веры» в главе 51 (III 7) присутствует рассуждение о Фаворском свете, которого нет в современном русском переводе.
«И на Фаворе [плоть Христова] просияла и сияет не по собственному естеству, но посредством действия ипостасно соединенного с нею Божества, как и дерево светит и жжет не собственным природным действием, но по причине приобщения действию ипостасно соединенного с этим деревом огня».
В некоторых рукописях (например, XI в., Bodl. Crom. gr. 13) «Точного изложения православной веры» в главе 51 (III 7) присутствует рассуждение о Фаворском свете, которого нет в современном русском переводе.
«И на Фаворе [плоть Христова] просияла и сияет не по собственному естеству, но посредством действия ипостасно соединенного с нею Божества, как и дерево светит и жжет не собственным природным действием, но по причине приобщения действию ипостасно соединенного с этим деревом огня».
He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones.
from it
