😋Этот танк ВСУ у Вербового в Запорожской области уничтожили «методом двух сбросов».
Первый оператор БПЛА скинулл гранату Ф-1 на крышу, чтобы разбить защитный «мангал». Второй – отправил зажигательный боеприпас в люк. Через некоторое время взорвался боекомплект танка – у вражеской машины оторвало башню.
😋Этот танк ВСУ у Вербового в Запорожской области уничтожили «методом двух сбросов».
Первый оператор БПЛА скинулл гранату Ф-1 на крышу, чтобы разбить защитный «мангал». Второй – отправил зажигательный боеприпас в люк. Через некоторое время взорвался боекомплект танка – у вражеской машины оторвало башню.
Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. In this regard, Sebi collaborated with the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) to reduce the vulnerability of the securities market to manipulation through misuse of mass communication medium like bulk SMS. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from it