Изменение стоимости проекта метро в Красноярске не повлияет на сроки начала его строительства.
Об этом ТАСС сообщил председатель совета директоров КрасноярскТИСИЗ Олег Митволь. Трест разрабатывал проект метрополитена. "Передвижек по срокам не требуется, никаких препятствий начинать работы по выносу сетей и подготовке котлованов мы не видим", - сказал Митволь.
Напомним, в середине июля вице-премьер РФ Марат Хуснуллин поручил властям Красноярского края уменьшить стоимость строительства метро в краевом центре. Сейчас она составляет 128 миллиардов рублей. По словам губернатора Александра Усса, специальная рабочая группа изучит варианты снижения затрат на 20-30%.
Изменение стоимости проекта метро в Красноярске не повлияет на сроки начала его строительства.
Об этом ТАСС сообщил председатель совета директоров КрасноярскТИСИЗ Олег Митволь. Трест разрабатывал проект метрополитена. "Передвижек по срокам не требуется, никаких препятствий начинать работы по выносу сетей и подготовке котлованов мы не видим", - сказал Митволь.
Напомним, в середине июля вице-премьер РФ Марат Хуснуллин поручил властям Красноярского края уменьшить стоимость строительства метро в краевом центре. Сейчас она составляет 128 миллиардов рублей. По словам губернатора Александра Усса, специальная рабочая группа изучит варианты снижения затрат на 20-30%.
BY Тайны Таймыра
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities.
from it
