Всё-таки гений - исключительное дело. Обратите внимание на лаконичность и ясность мысли.
Для тех, кому лень: 2005 год, Adobe нанимает людей из Apple, одного уже наняли, ещё многих переманивают. Стив Джобс пишет об этом письмо директору Adobe, где говорит, что у него политика - не нанимать из Adobe (высшая степень дружбы между компаниями). Но, раз у Adobe подход другой, один из них политику должен поменять.
К такому надо стремиться: сколько стиля и власти в скромном "please let me know who".
Upd. Против Adobe и Apple было дело по этому поводу - наверное, так и стало доступным письмо, потому что document production.
And in the past few years, the DOJ brought three civil enforcement actions against technology companies (eBay and Intuit, Lucasfilm and Pixar, and Adobe, Apple, Google, Intel, Intuit, and Pixar) that entered into “no poach” agreements with competitors. In all three cases, the competitors agreed not to cold call each other’s employees. In two cases, at least one company also agreed to limit its hiring of employees who currently worked at a competitor.
All three cases ended in consent judgments against the technology companies.
Всё-таки гений - исключительное дело. Обратите внимание на лаконичность и ясность мысли.
Для тех, кому лень: 2005 год, Adobe нанимает людей из Apple, одного уже наняли, ещё многих переманивают. Стив Джобс пишет об этом письмо директору Adobe, где говорит, что у него политика - не нанимать из Adobe (высшая степень дружбы между компаниями). Но, раз у Adobe подход другой, один из них политику должен поменять.
К такому надо стремиться: сколько стиля и власти в скромном "please let me know who".
Upd. Против Adobe и Apple было дело по этому поводу - наверное, так и стало доступным письмо, потому что document production.
And in the past few years, the DOJ brought three civil enforcement actions against technology companies (eBay and Intuit, Lucasfilm and Pixar, and Adobe, Apple, Google, Intel, Intuit, and Pixar) that entered into “no poach” agreements with competitors. In all three cases, the competitors agreed not to cold call each other’s employees. In two cases, at least one company also agreed to limit its hiring of employees who currently worked at a competitor.
All three cases ended in consent judgments against the technology companies.
In view of this, the regulator has cautioned investors not to rely on such investment tips / advice received through social media platforms. It has also said investors should exercise utmost caution while taking investment decisions while dealing in the securities market. For tech stocks, “the main thing is yields,” Essaye said. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. "Your messages about the movement of the enemy through the official chatbot … bring new trophies every day," the government agency tweeted. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from it
