Военкомы устроили облаву на похоронах всушника. В этот день, хоронили Дмитрия Хайруленко из Николаева, призванного в июне этого года и ликвидированного спустя пару месяцев в Курской области.
Когда его родные, близкие и знакомые поминали его в одном из местных кафе, туда ворвались сотрудники ТЦК и набрали на место усопшего новеньких, причем сразу 10 человек.
Военкомы устроили облаву на похоронах всушника. В этот день, хоронили Дмитрия Хайруленко из Николаева, призванного в июне этого года и ликвидированного спустя пару месяцев в Курской области.
Когда его родные, близкие и знакомые поминали его в одном из местных кафе, туда ворвались сотрудники ТЦК и набрали на место усопшего новеньких, причем сразу 10 человек.
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. "Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from it
