Параллельно российские чиновники утверждают, что все конфликты мигрантов с кем-либо вызваны не политикой империалистов, не произволом работодателей, не антимигрантскими погромами неонацистов и репрессивного аппарата, а происками иностранным спецслужб. Действительно, никаких ведь внутренних причин для недовольства у мигрантов нет, так? С чего бы им быть недовольными без влияния британской разведки?
Параллельно российские чиновники утверждают, что все конфликты мигрантов с кем-либо вызваны не политикой империалистов, не произволом работодателей, не антимигрантскими погромами неонацистов и репрессивного аппарата, а происками иностранным спецслужб. Действительно, никаких ведь внутренних причин для недовольства у мигрантов нет, так? С чего бы им быть недовольными без влияния британской разведки?
The channel appears to be part of the broader information war that has developed following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The Kremlin has paid Russian TikTok influencers to push propaganda, according to a Vice News investigation, while ProPublica found that fake Russian fact check videos had been viewed over a million times on Telegram. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. Again, in contrast to Facebook, Google and Twitter, Telegram's founder Pavel Durov runs his company in relative secrecy from Dubai. The gold standard of encryption, known as end-to-end encryption, where only the sender and person who receives the message are able to see it, is available on Telegram only when the Secret Chat function is enabled. Voice and video calls are also completely encrypted. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from it
