Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
Вясна | Брэст
⚡️Прокурор запросила лишение свободы для обоих обвиняемых Гособвинительница попросила наказание для Бабича в виде лишения свободы на 3 года и 6 месяцев с отбыванием в колонии общего режима. Для Шабалюка Михаила - на срок в 3 года, в условиях колонии общего…
3.5 и 3 года колонии по августовскому делу получили брестчане

Сегодня вынес вердикт суд Московского р-на Бреста по событиям 9 августа 2020. Он счел Бабича Александра и Шабалюка Михаила виновными в сопротивлении сотрудникам милиции и применении насилия и угрозы насилия (ч.2 ст.363 УК). За это судья Бреган Е.А. назначил наказание в виде лишения свободы с отбыванием в колонии общего режима, для Бабича три с половиной года, для Шабалюка - три года.



group-telegram.com/viasna_brest/321
Create:
Last Update:

3.5 и 3 года колонии по августовскому делу получили брестчане

Сегодня вынес вердикт суд Московского р-на Бреста по событиям 9 августа 2020. Он счел Бабича Александра и Шабалюка Михаила виновными в сопротивлении сотрудникам милиции и применении насилия и угрозы насилия (ч.2 ст.363 УК). За это судья Бреган Е.А. назначил наказание в виде лишения свободы с отбыванием в колонии общего режима, для Бабича три с половиной года, для Шабалюка - три года.

BY Вясна | Брэст


Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260

Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/viasna_brest/321

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. "There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Since January 2022, the SC has received a total of 47 complaints and enquiries on illegal investment schemes promoted through Telegram. These fraudulent schemes offer non-existent investment opportunities, promising very attractive and risk-free returns within a short span of time. They commonly offer unrealistic returns of as high as 1,000% within 24 hours or even within a few hours. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care.
from it


Telegram Вясна | Брэст
FROM American