نشریه علمی-ترویجی اومیکس به صاحب امتیازی انجمن علمی بیوتکنولوژی دانشگاه یزد، از شما اساتید محترم و دانشجویان گرامی دعوت می‌کند تا با ارائه مقالات خود در حوزه ترکیبات زیست‌فعال(Bioactive Compounds) دانش، تجربیات و نظرات خود را در جامعه علمی به اشتراک بگذارید.
⚜جهت ارسال مطالب، مقالات و کسب اطلاعات بیشتر می‌توانید با ما در ارتباط باشید:
نشریه علمی-ترویجی اومیکس به صاحب امتیازی انجمن علمی بیوتکنولوژی دانشگاه یزد، از شما اساتید محترم و دانشجویان گرامی دعوت می‌کند تا با ارائه مقالات خود در حوزه ترکیبات زیست‌فعال(Bioactive Compounds) دانش، تجربیات و نظرات خود را در جامعه علمی به اشتراک بگذارید.
⚜جهت ارسال مطالب، مقالات و کسب اطلاعات بیشتر می‌توانید با ما در ارتباط باشید:
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. WhatsApp, a rival messaging platform, introduced some measures to counter disinformation when Covid-19 was first sweeping the world. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. The picture was mixed overseas. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index fell 1.6%, under pressure from U.S. regulatory scrutiny on New York-listed Chinese companies. Stocks were more buoyant in Europe, where Frankfurt’s DAX surged 1.4%.
from jp
