أحس إنّي دائمًا ملحوظة ولا أحتاج أجذب إنتباه أيّ إنسان، ممكن لأني أشبّه نفسي بالشمس، وهذا الإحساس ينقذني دائمًا من أن أتبع دورب وسُبل لا تليق بي . #زعٌيަمࣩة𓃠
أحس إنّي دائمًا ملحوظة ولا أحتاج أجذب إنتباه أيّ إنسان، ممكن لأني أشبّه نفسي بالشمس، وهذا الإحساس ينقذني دائمًا من أن أتبع دورب وسُبل لا تليق بي . #زعٌيަمࣩة𓃠
He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm.
from jp
