У главы фонда капитального ремонта Свердловской области Станислава Суханова более взвешенный подход.
🔵 Надо рожать и сварщиков, и кровельщиков, и штукатуров, маляров. В общем, нужна рабочая сила».
Напомним, что еще летом уважаемый человек призывал рожать электриков:
🔵 Электриков, которые могут выполнять работы на капремонте можно по пальцам пересчитать. Надо каким-то образом этот вопрос решать. Надо в первую очередь научиться больше детей создавать семье»,
У главы фонда капитального ремонта Свердловской области Станислава Суханова более взвешенный подход.
🔵 Надо рожать и сварщиков, и кровельщиков, и штукатуров, маляров. В общем, нужна рабочая сила».
Напомним, что еще летом уважаемый человек призывал рожать электриков:
🔵 Электриков, которые могут выполнять работы на капремонте можно по пальцам пересчитать. Надо каким-то образом этот вопрос решать. Надо в первую очередь научиться больше детей создавать семье»,
This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted.
from jp