⚡️💥WHAT ARE "CLUSTER BOMBS"?💥⚡️ You may have been hearing about "cluster bombs" in the news lately. In Donetsk, we've been hearing them explode outside our homes and schools. Here's a quick class on what they are, what they do, what they look (and sound) like, what to look out for, and why they are banned by most countries.
⚡️💥ЧТО ТАКОЕ "КАССЕТНЫЕ БОМБЫ"?💥⚡️ Возможно, в последнее время в новостях вы слышали о "кассетных бомбах". В Донецке мы слышали, как они взрываются возле наших домов и школ. Вот краткий курс о том, что это такое, что они делают, как выглядят (и звучат), чего следует остерегаться и почему они запрещены в большинстве стран.
⚡️💥WHAT ARE "CLUSTER BOMBS"?💥⚡️ You may have been hearing about "cluster bombs" in the news lately. In Donetsk, we've been hearing them explode outside our homes and schools. Here's a quick class on what they are, what they do, what they look (and sound) like, what to look out for, and why they are banned by most countries.
⚡️💥ЧТО ТАКОЕ "КАССЕТНЫЕ БОМБЫ"?💥⚡️ Возможно, в последнее время в новостях вы слышали о "кассетных бомбах". В Донецке мы слышали, как они взрываются возле наших домов и школ. Вот краткий курс о том, что это такое, что они делают, как выглядят (и звучат), чего следует остерегаться и почему они запрещены в большинстве стран.
BY Russell TEXAS Bentley
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised.
from jp
