Жители Хакасии будут платить в 4 раза больше за российский газ, чем китайцы После повышения цен в республике россияне будут платить 125 рублей/куб, в то время как китайские потребители получают российский газ по 30 рублей за кубометр ($288 за тысячу кубометров). Надо выручать терпящее убытки национальное достояние
Жители Хакасии будут платить в 4 раза больше за российский газ, чем китайцы После повышения цен в республике россияне будут платить 125 рублей/куб, в то время как китайские потребители получают российский газ по 30 рублей за кубометр ($288 за тысячу кубометров). Надо выручать терпящее убытки национальное достояние
BY Андрей Нечаев
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Update March 8, 2022: EFF has clarified that Channels and Groups are not fully encrypted, end-to-end, updated our post to link to Telegram’s FAQ for Cloud and Secret chats, updated to clarify that auto-delete is available for group and channel admins, and added some additional links. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough In the past, it was noticed that through bulk SMSes, investors were induced to invest in or purchase the stocks of certain listed companies. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford.
from jp
