Выступающие против режима в Сирии вооруженные группы взяли под контроль аэропорт Алеппо
В Сирии выступающие против режима Башара Асада вооруженные группы взяли под контроль международный аэропорт в Алеппо, который силы режима оставили террористической организации PKK/YPG.
По информации местных источников, утром, после отступления сил режима Асада, вооруженные группы заняли международный аэропорт Алеппо на востоке города, который был передан террористической организации PKK/YPG.
После того как противники Асада вошли в центр города, режим оставил ряд стратегически важных объектов в Алеппо под контроль PKK/YPG.
Выступающие против режима в Сирии вооруженные группы взяли под контроль аэропорт Алеппо
В Сирии выступающие против режима Башара Асада вооруженные группы взяли под контроль международный аэропорт в Алеппо, который силы режима оставили террористической организации PKK/YPG.
По информации местных источников, утром, после отступления сил режима Асада, вооруженные группы заняли международный аэропорт Алеппо на востоке города, который был передан террористической организации PKK/YPG.
После того как противники Асада вошли в центр города, режим оставил ряд стратегически важных объектов в Алеппо под контроль PKK/YPG.
At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from jp
