🔶علاقه‌مندان می‌توانند جهت همکاری با نشریه‌ی #هموردا ، به عنوان نویسنده، هیئت تحریریه، ویراستار، مصاحبه‌گر، پژوهشگر، طراح وگوینده، در پیام‌رسان ایتا، با روابط عمومی انجمن به آیدی @Qom_Physics در ارتباط باشند.
🔶علاقه‌مندان می‌توانند جهت همکاری با نشریه‌ی #هموردا ، به عنوان نویسنده، هیئت تحریریه، ویراستار، مصاحبه‌گر، پژوهشگر، طراح وگوینده، در پیام‌رسان ایتا، با روابط عمومی انجمن به آیدی @Qom_Physics در ارتباط باشند.
Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. And while money initially moved into stocks in the morning, capital moved out of safe-haven assets. The price of the 10-year Treasury note fell Friday, sending its yield up to 2% from a March closing low of 1.73%. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred."
from jp
