Симпатичный и хорошо сделанный сюжет в программе Время на первом. Мы с Пифией,Михаилом и Нейри в приятной компании (привет Федору и Юре с Моторикой :) )
Здорово, что такой крупный научный сюжет в новый год пустили.
Симпатичный и хорошо сделанный сюжет в программе Время на первом. Мы с Пифией,Михаилом и Нейри в приятной компании (привет Федору и Юре с Моторикой :) )
Здорово, что такой крупный научный сюжет в новый год пустили.
BY Нейроинтерфейсы
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content.
from jp