«Мы не только сейчас находимся в обороне, а надо понимать, что нас намеренно истощают абсолютно по всей линии фронта, чтобы дальше реализовывать их задачи уже другими какими-либо способами, – заявила экс-замминистра обороны Украины Анна «Контрнаступ любит тишину» Маляр.
Она призвала понять и принять мобилизацию:
«Я откровенно не понимаю, почему мобилизация для общества – это такая страшная тема. Война вообще страшная, и во время войны будет мобилизация».
«Мы не только сейчас находимся в обороне, а надо понимать, что нас намеренно истощают абсолютно по всей линии фронта, чтобы дальше реализовывать их задачи уже другими какими-либо способами, – заявила экс-замминистра обороны Украины Анна «Контрнаступ любит тишину» Маляр.
Она призвала понять и принять мобилизацию:
«Я откровенно не понимаю, почему мобилизация для общества – это такая страшная тема. Война вообще страшная, и во время войны будет мобилизация».
Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. That hurt tech stocks. For the past few weeks, the 10-year yield has traded between 1.72% and 2%, as traders moved into the bond for safety when Russia headlines were ugly—and out of it when headlines improved. Now, the yield is touching its pandemic-era high. If the yield breaks above that level, that could signal that it’s on a sustainable path higher. Higher long-dated bond yields make future profits less valuable—and many tech companies are valued on the basis of profits forecast for many years in the future. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from jp
