Алёшкинский песок. Защитникам Херсонской области. Павшим и живым...
Ополченцы, мы должны сделать так, чтобы ребята вернулись живыми и здоровыми. Тут важен каждый рубль, каждый репост. И все снаряжение, что мы собираем и передаем в полк, служит именно этому. Ради одной общей цели - нашей Победы!
Алёшкинский песок. Защитникам Херсонской области. Павшим и живым...
Ополченцы, мы должны сделать так, чтобы ребята вернулись живыми и здоровыми. Тут важен каждый рубль, каждый репост. И все снаряжение, что мы собираем и передаем в полк, служит именно этому. Ради одной общей цели - нашей Победы!
The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat.
from jp
