Помните у Льва были проблемы с регуляцией злости (про драки в садике писала тут) и мы стали читать много всяких книжек про эмоции. Так вот теперь мне это аукнулось. Стоит мне разозлиться и повысить голос, как Лев тут же декламирует:
Помните у Льва были проблемы с регуляцией злости (про драки в садике писала тут) и мы стали читать много всяких книжек про эмоции. Так вот теперь мне это аукнулось. Стоит мне разозлиться и повысить голос, как Лев тут же декламирует:
— Мам, успокойся. Вдох и выыыыыдох…. И сё!
BY Даша, которая пишет
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. Sebi said data, emails and other documents are being retrieved from the seized devices and detailed investigation is in progress. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from jp
