🚗На СибВО, видимо, чей-то батя осознал, что на правом плече у него Даниэль, на левом - Доминик и дрифт посреди проезжей части на ведроиде, помнящем вертикального Ленина - идея блеск.
🏚В это время в Северном рысь доедает собаку из пакета на фоне нового сортира на Таёжке, который просто показывают как красивое, использовать - никак.
🚗На СибВО, видимо, чей-то батя осознал, что на правом плече у него Даниэль, на левом - Доминик и дрифт посреди проезжей части на ведроиде, помнящем вертикального Ленина - идея блеск.
🏚В это время в Северном рысь доедает собаку из пакета на фоне нового сортира на Таёжке, который просто показывают как красивое, использовать - никак.
Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images "He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform.
from jp
