Подготовили правовое мнение по законопроекту о видеоиграх. Считаем, что ряд положений проекта создает высокие риски утечки персональных данных граждан и нарушает конституционные права граждан на неприкосновенность частной жизни. Считаем, что законопроект нуждается в существенной содержательной и юридической доработке с привлечением профильных специалистов, а также разработчиков видеоигр, в том числе, приведении его в соответствие с нормами действующего законодательства. Заключение направим в Госдуму и Совет Федерации.
Подготовили правовое мнение по законопроекту о видеоиграх. Считаем, что ряд положений проекта создает высокие риски утечки персональных данных граждан и нарушает конституционные права граждан на неприкосновенность частной жизни. Считаем, что законопроект нуждается в существенной содержательной и юридической доработке с привлечением профильных специалистов, а также разработчиков видеоигр, в том числе, приведении его в соответствие с нормами действующего законодательства. Заключение направим в Госдуму и Совет Федерации.
BY Екатерина Мизулина
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
"Like the bombing of the maternity ward in Mariupol," he said, "Even before it hits the news, you see the videos on the Telegram channels." At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from jp
