المجلس 150 من مجالس كتاب 🌴أبو بكر الصديق رضي الله عنه شخصيته وعصره 🌴 تأليف الدكتور علي محمد الصلابي الفصل الثالث حروب الردة تابع فتنة طليحة الأسدي دروس وعبر
المجلس 150 من مجالس كتاب 🌴أبو بكر الصديق رضي الله عنه شخصيته وعصره 🌴 تأليف الدكتور علي محمد الصلابي الفصل الثالث حروب الردة تابع فتنة طليحة الأسدي دروس وعبر
👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
BY قناة د محمد صبري النبتيتي قناة دعوية (تفسير -حديث_سيرة _خطب_ رد على الشبهات _موعظة _تفكر)
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content.
from jp
