❗️Триллер из Красногоровки (ДНР): во время записи репортажа за военкором RT Андреем Филатовым @filatovcorr начал охотиться вражеский дрон.
Эмоции Филатова на видео от первого лица во время атаки FPV-дрона — бесценны.
Это было в здании кирпичного завода, где он находился с бойцами ВС РФ. Военные готовились к штурму. Задача была оттеснить личный состав ВСУ от места последующего штурма, чтобы не приходилось бодаться с противником на открытом пространстве.
Кадры были сняты 4 мая. Ранее публиковать их не позволяла оперативная обстановка. #ВоенкорыRT
❗️Триллер из Красногоровки (ДНР): во время записи репортажа за военкором RT Андреем Филатовым @filatovcorr начал охотиться вражеский дрон.
Эмоции Филатова на видео от первого лица во время атаки FPV-дрона — бесценны.
Это было в здании кирпичного завода, где он находился с бойцами ВС РФ. Военные готовились к штурму. Задача была оттеснить личный состав ВСУ от места последующего штурма, чтобы не приходилось бодаться с противником на открытом пространстве.
Кадры были сняты 4 мая. Ранее публиковать их не позволяла оперативная обстановка. #ВоенкорыRT
BY Репортер Filatov
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government. Stocks dropped on Friday afternoon, as gains made earlier in the day on hopes for diplomatic progress between Russia and Ukraine turned to losses. Technology stocks were hit particularly hard by higher bond yields.
from jp
