«Мы продолжаем СВО. Нам важно выполнить все задачи, которые стоят по обеспечению безопасности нашей страны. Как неоднократно говорил президент Путин, мы сохраняем открытость для решения наших проблем по средствам переговоров. Но поскольку пока никаких подвижек с точки зрения Украины к переговорам нет, мы продолжаем нашу операцию. Мы видим динамику, динамика говорит сама за себя и идем вперед».
«Мы продолжаем СВО. Нам важно выполнить все задачи, которые стоят по обеспечению безопасности нашей страны. Как неоднократно говорил президент Путин, мы сохраняем открытость для решения наших проблем по средствам переговоров. Но поскольку пока никаких подвижек с точки зрения Украины к переговорам нет, мы продолжаем нашу операцию. Мы видим динамику, динамика говорит сама за себя и идем вперед».
BY Андрей Малахов V Z Знать и понимать!
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements.
from jp
