Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 7809 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Михаил Хазин | Telegram Webview: hazinOpen/1647 -
Эфир со Стивом Дудником от 2 декабря 2024 года: https://khazin.ru/ocherednoj-efi... ************************************** **************************************
Полная версия доступна в закрытом канале по подписке с помощью бота
Эфир со Стивом Дудником от 2 декабря 2024 года: https://khazin.ru/ocherednoj-efi... ************************************** **************************************
Полная версия доступна в закрытом канале по подписке с помощью бота
"The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. "Like the bombing of the maternity ward in Mariupol," he said, "Even before it hits the news, you see the videos on the Telegram channels." For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content.
from jp