я остановиться не в силах. – кто-нибудь, из прохожих, прервите же гул! оборачиваюсь, а позади никого. пустота и не густо. твоё имя: едкие несъедобные буквы; в разуме постоянный шум; чб-крапинка на сломанном канале в прямом неонлайн-эфире. по тебе у меня текут слюнки. поцелуй мои онемевшие пальцы. нестерпимо скучать по тебе. пока у графика функции есть касательная, ты возводишь меня в наивысшую степень отчаяния. и отдаёшь на растерзание дробей.
я остановиться не в силах. – кто-нибудь, из прохожих, прервите же гул! оборачиваюсь, а позади никого. пустота и не густо. твоё имя: едкие несъедобные буквы; в разуме постоянный шум; чб-крапинка на сломанном канале в прямом неонлайн-эфире. по тебе у меня текут слюнки. поцелуй мои онемевшие пальцы. нестерпимо скучать по тебе. пока у графика функции есть касательная, ты возводишь меня в наивысшую степень отчаяния. и отдаёшь на растерзание дробей.
Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. In this regard, Sebi collaborated with the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) to reduce the vulnerability of the securities market to manipulation through misuse of mass communication medium like bulk SMS. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. READ MORE
from jp
