— Можно ли простить измену? — Можно, но зачем? Когда любят — берегут, боятся потерять. Раз изменяют, значит больше не любят, — если потерять не боятся. Тогда зачем прощать и оставаться с человеком, который отказался от тебя?
📌 Ринат Валиуллин 📖«В каждом молчании своя истерика»
— Можно ли простить измену? — Можно, но зачем? Когда любят — берегут, боятся потерять. Раз изменяют, значит больше не любят, — если потерять не боятся. Тогда зачем прощать и оставаться с человеком, который отказался от тебя?
📌 Ринат Валиуллин 📖«В каждом молчании своя истерика»
BY Книжный дневник 📚
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from jp
