Для донатов: +7-961-939-09-05 (Сбер, Тинькофф, Райффайзенбанк)
На Бастионе появилась монетизация. Комментируйте там, звезды ставьте и подписывайтесь по моей ссылке. Там немного, но будет облегчать затраты на еду и отопление ☺️
Для донатов: +7-961-939-09-05 (Сбер, Тинькофф, Райффайзенбанк)
На Бастионе появилась монетизация. Комментируйте там, звезды ставьте и подписывайтесь по моей ссылке. Там немного, но будет облегчать затраты на еду и отопление ☺️
Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. In a message on his Telegram channel recently recounting the episode, Durov wrote: "I lost my company and my home, but would do it again – without hesitation."
from jp
