Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 7568 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Критик новостной ленты | Telegram Webview: kritiknewsfeed/21115 -
Вот и 👆сенатор-республиканец Линдси Грэм (и видимо не он один) в восторге от украинского президента и его операции ВСУ в Курской области и считает, что США должно больше вовлекаться в процесс помощи Украине, даже привлекать американских летчиков-пенсионеров, посадив их на украинские F-16. Поддержка действий Зеленского слышна и из Европы, в частности, Министерство иностранных дел Германии, комментируя события в Курской области России, утверждает, что Украина имеет право на самозащиту, и не только на своей территории.
Вот и 👆сенатор-республиканец Линдси Грэм (и видимо не он один) в восторге от украинского президента и его операции ВСУ в Курской области и считает, что США должно больше вовлекаться в процесс помощи Украине, даже привлекать американских летчиков-пенсионеров, посадив их на украинские F-16. Поддержка действий Зеленского слышна и из Европы, в частности, Министерство иностранных дел Германии, комментируя события в Курской области России, утверждает, что Украина имеет право на самозащиту, и не только на своей территории.
BY Критик новостной ленты
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today."
from jp