👍👍👍👍👍👍 Фотография семилетнего Дмитрия Косинова, жителя камчатского села Сосновка, заняла второе место на Всероссийском этапе фотоконкурса «Один миг из жизни спасателя».
В кадре запечатлены трое огнеборцев, снятые в момент тушения пожара в частном доме.
Напомним, работы на участие в конкурсе принимались до 1 июня 2024 года. Позднее фотографии победителей регионального этапа были направлены на Всероссийский этап конкурса.
👍👍👍👍👍👍 Фотография семилетнего Дмитрия Косинова, жителя камчатского села Сосновка, заняла второе место на Всероссийском этапе фотоконкурса «Один миг из жизни спасателя».
В кадре запечатлены трое огнеборцев, снятые в момент тушения пожара в частном доме.
Напомним, работы на участие в конкурсе принимались до 1 июня 2024 года. Позднее фотографии победителей регионального этапа были направлены на Всероссийский этап конкурса.
Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." "Like the bombing of the maternity ward in Mariupol," he said, "Even before it hits the news, you see the videos on the Telegram channels." Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from jp
