I FUCKING LOVE ТРУПЫ ПИДОРОВ РАЗОРВАННЫЕ СОЖЖЕНЫЕ ИЗУРОДОВАНЫЕ ЛЕЖАЩИЕ КУЧАМИ В НЕЕСТЕСТВЕННЫХ ПОЗАХ ОКРУЖЕННЫЕ МУСОРОМ ОБГОРЕВШИЕ СГНИВШИЕ КОРМЯЩИЕ МУХ И ЛИЧИНОК ЛИШЕННЫЕ ОРГАНОВ И КОНЕЧНОСТЕЙ
I FUCKING LOVE ТРУПЫ ПИДОРОВ РАЗОРВАННЫЕ СОЖЖЕНЫЕ ИЗУРОДОВАНЫЕ ЛЕЖАЩИЕ КУЧАМИ В НЕЕСТЕСТВЕННЫХ ПОЗАХ ОКРУЖЕННЫЕ МУСОРОМ ОБГОРЕВШИЕ СГНИВШИЕ КОРМЯЩИЕ МУХ И ЛИЧИНОК ЛИШЕННЫЕ ОРГАНОВ И КОНЕЧНОСТЕЙ
This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych.
from jp
