Президент самопровозглашенной Турецкой республики Северного Кипра (ТРСК) Эрсин Татар примет участие в предстоящем в Бишкеке 6 ноября очередном саммите Организации тюркских государств (ОТГ). «В работе саммита примут участие лидеры пяти государств-членов организации — Турецкой Республики, Азербайджанской Республики, Республики Казахстан, Кыргызской Республики и Республики Узбекистан, а также главы стран — наблюдателей организации», — сообщила пресс-служба кабинета министров Киргизии.
Президент самопровозглашенной Турецкой республики Северного Кипра (ТРСК) Эрсин Татар примет участие в предстоящем в Бишкеке 6 ноября очередном саммите Организации тюркских государств (ОТГ). «В работе саммита примут участие лидеры пяти государств-членов организации — Турецкой Республики, Азербайджанской Республики, Республики Казахстан, Кыргызской Республики и Республики Узбекистан, а также главы стран — наблюдателей организации», — сообщила пресс-служба кабинета министров Киргизии.
BY Московская прачечная
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. The fake Zelenskiy account reached 20,000 followers on Telegram before it was shut down, a remedial action that experts say is all too rare. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from jp
