Разрыв между Россией и ЕС происходит много лет. Отношения последовательно разрывает Европейский союз - Лавров
«Поворотным пунктом стал 2014 год. Когда на Украине случился госпереворот и ЕС показал свою беспомощность в отношении той договорённости, которая была достигнута накануне между властью и оппозицией, под которой поставили подписи Германия, Франция и Польша. Оппозиция (Украины) наплевала на подписи и мнение 🇪🇺, которое заключалось в том, чтобы эту договоренность выполнять. Я считаю именно тогда состоялось унижение ЕС»
Разрыв между Россией и ЕС происходит много лет. Отношения последовательно разрывает Европейский союз - Лавров
«Поворотным пунктом стал 2014 год. Когда на Украине случился госпереворот и ЕС показал свою беспомощность в отношении той договорённости, которая была достигнута накануне между властью и оппозицией, под которой поставили подписи Германия, Франция и Польша. Оппозиция (Украины) наплевала на подписи и мнение 🇪🇺, которое заключалось в том, чтобы эту договоренность выполнять. Я считаю именно тогда состоялось унижение ЕС»
BY Национальный Z Курс
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Overall, extreme levels of fear in the market seems to have morphed into something more resembling concern. For example, the Cboe Volatility Index fell from its 2022 peak of 36, which it hit Monday, to around 30 on Friday, a sign of easing tensions. Meanwhile, while the price of WTI crude oil slipped from Sunday’s multiyear high $130 of barrel to $109 a pop. Markets have been expecting heavy restrictions on Russian oil, some of which the U.S. has already imposed, and that would reduce the global supply and bring about even more burdensome inflation. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war.
from jp
