Пока ехал из точки А в точку Б, накидал как я вижу по событиям в Сирии. Свое никому ненужное мнение 💰 Без денег люди не воюют, даже за религию. По этому они будут пробиваться за нефтью. Потому что там она есть и кормиться хватит. Напомню что от Дамаска и за Евфрат, всю эту территорию на ногах зачистили от ИГИЛ(запрещенные везде где только можно) Штурмовики Вагнера. Сколько русской крови и пота впитала пустынная пыль и камни? В память о наших Павших сотрудниках, не сдавайте больше Пальмиру! А они попрут потом на Пальму!
Пока ехал из точки А в точку Б, накидал как я вижу по событиям в Сирии. Свое никому ненужное мнение 💰 Без денег люди не воюют, даже за религию. По этому они будут пробиваться за нефтью. Потому что там она есть и кормиться хватит. Напомню что от Дамаска и за Евфрат, всю эту территорию на ногах зачистили от ИГИЛ(запрещенные везде где только можно) Штурмовики Вагнера. Сколько русской крови и пота впитала пустынная пыль и камни? В память о наших Павших сотрудниках, не сдавайте больше Пальмиру! А они попрут потом на Пальму!
The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides.
from jp
