🔔Мошенники используют поддельные ссылки или кражу сессионных файлов cookie для обхода двухфакторной аутентификации, чтобы завладеть данными пользователей Gmail
Член комиссии по поддержке ИТ-индустрии Общественного совета при Минцифры России Владимир Маслов дал рекомендации, как защитить свои данные при использовании почтовых сервисов ⬆️
🔔Мошенники используют поддельные ссылки или кражу сессионных файлов cookie для обхода двухфакторной аутентификации, чтобы завладеть данными пользователей Gmail
Член комиссии по поддержке ИТ-индустрии Общественного совета при Минцифры России Владимир Маслов дал рекомендации, как защитить свои данные при использовании почтовых сервисов ⬆️
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Telegram was co-founded by Pavel and Nikolai Durov, the brothers who had previously created VKontakte. VK is Russia’s equivalent of Facebook, a social network used for public and private messaging, audio and video sharing as well as online gaming. In January, SimpleWeb reported that VK was Russia’s fourth most-visited website, after Yandex, YouTube and Google’s Russian-language homepage. In 2016, Forbes’ Michael Solomon described Pavel Durov (pictured, below) as the “Mark Zuckerberg of Russia.” In a statement, the regulator said the search and seizure operation was carried out against seven individuals and one corporate entity at multiple locations in Ahmedabad and Bhavnagar in Gujarat, Neemuch in Madhya Pradesh, Delhi, and Mumbai. These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted.
from jp