Главные тезисы интервью аль-Джулани: 📍«Хайят Тахрир аш-Шам не представляет угрозу безопасности Европы и Америки; 📍Идлиб не является плацдармом для джихада в других странах.
Организатор интервью со стороны террористов: 🏴Офис по связям со СМИ «Правительства спасения» (создан в 2020 году). Кроме PBS Frontline данная структура также организовывала «пресс-тур» New York Tines в Идлиб.
Однако куда как более интересным выглядит список всех участников кампании по обелению аль-Джулани.
Главные тезисы интервью аль-Джулани: 📍«Хайят Тахрир аш-Шам не представляет угрозу безопасности Европы и Америки; 📍Идлиб не является плацдармом для джихада в других странах.
Организатор интервью со стороны террористов: 🏴Офис по связям со СМИ «Правительства спасения» (создан в 2020 году). Кроме PBS Frontline данная структура также организовывала «пресс-тур» New York Tines в Идлиб.
Однако куда как более интересным выглядит список всех участников кампании по обелению аль-Джулани.
In a message on his Telegram channel recently recounting the episode, Durov wrote: "I lost my company and my home, but would do it again – without hesitation." On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from jp
