«Качество фальсификата снизилось до неприемлемого» — такой комментарий к предыдущему посту о поддельных молочных продуктах написал один из подписчиков. И он вполне может быть прав: растительные жиры тоже бывают разными, как и всевозможные присадки, использующиеся при создании таких продуктов.
«Качество фальсификата снизилось до неприемлемого» — такой комментарий к предыдущему посту о поддельных молочных продуктах написал один из подписчиков. И он вполне может быть прав: растительные жиры тоже бывают разными, как и всевозможные присадки, использующиеся при создании таких продуктов.
On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from jp
