Кэпитоловская часть Бадаевского уже в состоянии полного разьеба ну или как принято говорить для официальных пресс-релизов: "идёт активный этап реконструкции".
Сделки начали регистрировать по 2 мульта за метр, тем самым став одним из самых дорогих проектов на рынке вместе с Лаврушинским. Только там "курортная" архитектура от СПИЧ, а тут Херцог и де Мерон. Не оксимирон.
Кэпитоловская часть Бадаевского уже в состоянии полного разьеба ну или как принято говорить для официальных пресс-релизов: "идёт активный этап реконструкции".
Сделки начали регистрировать по 2 мульта за метр, тем самым став одним из самых дорогих проектов на рынке вместе с Лаврушинским. Только там "курортная" архитектура от СПИЧ, а тут Херцог и де Мерон. Не оксимирон.
Under the Sebi Act, the regulator has the power to carry out search and seizure of books, registers, documents including electronics and digital devices from any person associated with the securities market. The fake Zelenskiy account reached 20,000 followers on Telegram before it was shut down, a remedial action that experts say is all too rare. In a statement, the regulator said the search and seizure operation was carried out against seven individuals and one corporate entity at multiple locations in Ahmedabad and Bhavnagar in Gujarat, Neemuch in Madhya Pradesh, Delhi, and Mumbai. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities.
from jp
