Глава комитета Совета Федерации по конституционному законодательству и госстроительству Андрей Клишас о правовом регулировании темы пропаганды чайлдфри:
💬Я считаю, честно говоря, что это некое излишнее правовое регулирование. Но у нас [законопроект] подписали огромное количество депутатов Госдумы, подписала Валентина Ивановна [Матвиенко] с группой сенаторов <...>. Но будет противоречивая правоприменительная практика по данному закону в любом случае, я думаю. <…> Мы потратили достаточно много усилий, чтобы урегулировать ту очевидную проблему, которая возникает, как показалось церкви, связанную с монашествующими.
Глава комитета Совета Федерации по конституционному законодательству и госстроительству Андрей Клишас о правовом регулировании темы пропаганды чайлдфри:
💬Я считаю, честно говоря, что это некое излишнее правовое регулирование. Но у нас [законопроект] подписали огромное количество депутатов Госдумы, подписала Валентина Ивановна [Матвиенко] с группой сенаторов <...>. Но будет противоречивая правоприменительная практика по данному закону в любом случае, я думаю. <…> Мы потратили достаточно много усилий, чтобы урегулировать ту очевидную проблему, которая возникает, как показалось церкви, связанную с монашествующими.
At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. In 2014, Pavel Durov fled the country after allies of the Kremlin took control of the social networking site most know just as VK. Russia's intelligence agency had asked Durov to turn over the data of anti-Kremlin protesters. Durov refused to do so. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from jp
