✍ بهترین راه جلوگیری از شایعه‌پراکنی ایجاد نظام اقامۀ دعوی است زیرا که امکان اقامۀ دعوی برای کشوری آزاد همان قدر سودمند است که افترا زدن زیانبار است. فرق میان آن دو اینجاست که برای افترا زدن اقامۀ شاهد لازم نیست و اصلاً نیازی به اثبات درستی افترا وجود ندارد و از این رو هر کسی می‌تواند به هر کس تهمت بنهد در حالی که برای اقامۀ دعوی نیازمند دلیل و گواه است. دعوی را باید در دادگاه یا در برابر سنا یا در مقابل مردم اقامه کرد ولی جای افترا زدن و شایعه پراکندن میدان‌های عمومی و محافل خصوصی است.
آنجا که نظام اقامۀ دعوی وجود ندارد افترا زدن رواج می‌یابد.
✍ بهترین راه جلوگیری از شایعه‌پراکنی ایجاد نظام اقامۀ دعوی است زیرا که امکان اقامۀ دعوی برای کشوری آزاد همان قدر سودمند است که افترا زدن زیانبار است. فرق میان آن دو اینجاست که برای افترا زدن اقامۀ شاهد لازم نیست و اصلاً نیازی به اثبات درستی افترا وجود ندارد و از این رو هر کسی می‌تواند به هر کس تهمت بنهد در حالی که برای اقامۀ دعوی نیازمند دلیل و گواه است. دعوی را باید در دادگاه یا در برابر سنا یا در مقابل مردم اقامه کرد ولی جای افترا زدن و شایعه پراکندن میدان‌های عمومی و محافل خصوصی است.
آنجا که نظام اقامۀ دعوی وجود ندارد افترا زدن رواج می‌یابد.
"We're seeing really dramatic moves, and it's all really tied to Ukraine right now, and in a secondary way, in terms of interest rates," Octavio Marenzi, CEO of Opimas, told Yahoo Finance Live on Thursday. "This war in Ukraine is going to give the Fed the ammunition, the cover that it needs, to not raise interest rates too quickly. And I think Jay Powell is a very tepid sort of inflation fighter and he's not going to do as much as he needs to do to get that under control. And this seems like an excuse to kick the can further down the road still and not do too much too soon." "He has kind of an old-school cyber-libertarian world view where technology is there to set you free," Maréchal said. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. "Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from jp
