Очень прикольная табличка — Ленин, Сталин и все коммунисты-ленинисты XX века отнесены к «идеологиям модернизации» в одном ряду с Ататюрком, Сун Ятсеном, Сукарно или Джавахарлалом Неру.
Мне кажется, это имеет достаточно много смысла — «модернизационный авторитаризм» это правда, пожалуй, одна из главных движущих сил истории XX века, и коммунисты вполне в него вписываются. И это неплохой способ посмотреть на историю сбоку — не через призму «левые-правые». Это полезная, но не единственная призма.
Очень прикольная табличка — Ленин, Сталин и все коммунисты-ленинисты XX века отнесены к «идеологиям модернизации» в одном ряду с Ататюрком, Сун Ятсеном, Сукарно или Джавахарлалом Неру.
Мне кажется, это имеет достаточно много смысла — «модернизационный авторитаризм» это правда, пожалуй, одна из главных движущих сил истории XX века, и коммунисты вполне в него вписываются. И это неплохой способ посмотреть на историю сбоку — не через призму «левые-правые». Это полезная, но не единственная призма.
The fake Zelenskiy account reached 20,000 followers on Telegram before it was shut down, a remedial action that experts say is all too rare. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from jp
