Недавно Маша, моя соседка по Балтике, рассказала, что из-за частых и сильных ветров верила, что дома на балконе живет страшное Выло. 😀
В Калининграде обнаружены: дед пугающего существа по имени Завывало, мать Поддувало и брат Сморявыгоняло😀. Недовольные ребята второй день будоражат море и чаек! На первом видео видно, что сопротивление птиц бесполезно.
Недавно Маша, моя соседка по Балтике, рассказала, что из-за частых и сильных ветров верила, что дома на балконе живет страшное Выло. 😀
В Калининграде обнаружены: дед пугающего существа по имени Завывало, мать Поддувало и брат Сморявыгоняло😀. Недовольные ребята второй день будоражат море и чаек! На первом видео видно, что сопротивление птиц бесполезно.
Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform.
from jp
