⚡️Талибы подтвердили 1 погибшего и 8 раненых при теракте в Мазари-Шарифе
По словам Мохаммада Асифа Вазири, пресс-секретаря местной полиции талибов*, среди раненых 3 несовершеннолетних. Погибшим оказался охранник.
По данным иранского агентства AVA Press, которое связано с центром "Тебиян", погибли 3 человека, еще около 30 получили ранения. Журналист Биляль Сарвари настаивает на 7 погибших
*организация находится под санкциями ООН за террористическую деятельность
⚡️Талибы подтвердили 1 погибшего и 8 раненых при теракте в Мазари-Шарифе
По словам Мохаммада Асифа Вазири, пресс-секретаря местной полиции талибов*, среди раненых 3 несовершеннолетних. Погибшим оказался охранник.
По данным иранского агентства AVA Press, которое связано с центром "Тебиян", погибли 3 человека, еще около 30 получили ранения. Журналист Биляль Сарвари настаивает на 7 погибших
*организация находится под санкциями ООН за террористическую деятельность
In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from jp
