Илон Маск осудил блокировку Twitter-аккаунта New York Post за публикацию расследования о Хантере Байдене
В материале рассказывалось о том, как Байден-младший использовал служебное положение отца в личных целях.
Перед выборами 2020 года Twitter подверг цензуре резонансную статью New York Post и заблокировал аккаунт издания. Однако позже подлинность материала подтвердили и либеральные медиа. Аккаунт New York Post в итоге разблокировали.
Илон Маск осудил блокировку Twitter-аккаунта New York Post за публикацию расследования о Хантере Байдене
В материале рассказывалось о том, как Байден-младший использовал служебное положение отца в личных целях.
Перед выборами 2020 года Twitter подверг цензуре резонансную статью New York Post и заблокировал аккаунт издания. Однако позже подлинность материала подтвердили и либеральные медиа. Аккаунт New York Post в итоге разблокировали.
Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. "There is a significant risk of insider threat or hacking of Telegram systems that could expose all of these chats to the Russian government," said Eva Galperin with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has called for Telegram to improve its privacy practices. In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from jp
