Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 66 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50

Warning: file_put_contents(): Only 8192 of 8258 bytes written, possibly out of free disk space in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50
竹新社 | Telegram Webview: tnews365/23813 -
Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
香港,已解散的支联会被控煽动他人颠覆国家政权案,被告之一前副主席邹幸彤,早前根据香港法例《裁判官条例》第 87A 条,提出撤销交付高院程序的报道限制,被指定法官、主任裁判官罗德泉驳回,邹就此入禀司法覆核挑战。指定法官李运腾2日裁定邹胜诉
李认同邹一方所指,根据法例条文字眼,当被告提出申请,裁判官便“须”(shall)解除限制,裁判官有关决定属越权。
李运腾又指,即使真的有酌情权,裁判官亦未能说明相关报道限制在本案属“绝对必要”。因此,李下令废除罗德泉拒绝撤限的决定,并下令案件下次再提讯时,罗德泉必须根据第 87A 条撤销报道限制。
早前,民主派47人被告串谋颠覆国家政权罪同样有被告在进行交付高等法院审判程序时,提出同类申请,当时裁判官押后至9月15日决定。
法庭线,香港司法机构)



group-telegram.com/tnews365/23813
Create:
Last Update:

香港,已解散的支联会被控煽动他人颠覆国家政权案,被告之一前副主席邹幸彤,早前根据香港法例《裁判官条例》第 87A 条,提出撤销交付高院程序的报道限制,被指定法官、主任裁判官罗德泉驳回,邹就此入禀司法覆核挑战。指定法官李运腾2日裁定邹胜诉
李认同邹一方所指,根据法例条文字眼,当被告提出申请,裁判官便“须”(shall)解除限制,裁判官有关决定属越权。
李运腾又指,即使真的有酌情权,裁判官亦未能说明相关报道限制在本案属“绝对必要”。因此,李下令废除罗德泉拒绝撤限的决定,并下令案件下次再提讯时,罗德泉必须根据第 87A 条撤销报道限制。
早前,民主派47人被告串谋颠覆国家政权罪同样有被告在进行交付高等法院审判程序时,提出同类申请,当时裁判官押后至9月15日决定。
法庭线,香港司法机构)

BY 竹新社


Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260

Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/tnews365/23813

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." Stocks closed in the red Friday as investors weighed upbeat remarks from Russian President Vladimir Putin about diplomatic discussions with Ukraine against a weaker-than-expected print on U.S. consumer sentiment. Artem Kliuchnikov and his family fled Ukraine just days before the Russian invasion. Since January 2022, the SC has received a total of 47 complaints and enquiries on illegal investment schemes promoted through Telegram. These fraudulent schemes offer non-existent investment opportunities, promising very attractive and risk-free returns within a short span of time. They commonly offer unrealistic returns of as high as 1,000% within 24 hours or even within a few hours. However, the perpetrators of such frauds are now adopting new methods and technologies to defraud the investors.
from jp


Telegram 竹新社
FROM American