Сегодня день рождения у нашего лидера — Владимира Путина, Президента России и Председателя Наблюдательного совета платформы «Россия — страна возможностей» 🎉
Именно благодаря ему в 2018 году была создана наша платформа, которая уже шесть лет помогает россиянам реализовать себя в различных проектах, конкурсах и олимпиадах.
Владимир Владимирович, от всей команды желаем крепкого здоровья, благополучия и неиссякаемой энергии! Спасибо, что делаете Россию страной возможностей ✨
Сегодня день рождения у нашего лидера — Владимира Путина, Президента России и Председателя Наблюдательного совета платформы «Россия — страна возможностей» 🎉
Именно благодаря ему в 2018 году была создана наша платформа, которая уже шесть лет помогает россиянам реализовать себя в различных проектах, конкурсах и олимпиадах.
Владимир Владимирович, от всей команды желаем крепкого здоровья, благополучия и неиссякаемой энергии! Спасибо, что делаете Россию страной возможностей ✨
Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from jp
