під типом я маю на увазі не електрика, вода, звук, тощо, а типу природний тип створення і маніпуляція, посилення, ослаблення, штучний тип створення і маніпуляція, етк
під типом я маю на увазі не електрика, вода, звук, тощо, а типу природний тип створення і маніпуляція, посилення, ослаблення, штучний тип створення і маніпуляція, етк
BY spooky маарав 𝜗ৎ #МІНТЧОКО❤️🩹❤️🩹
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. In December 2021, Sebi officials had conducted a search and seizure operation at the premises of certain persons carrying out similar manipulative activities through Telegram channels. The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels.
from jp
