«Хулиганил, дразнился, дрался, напивался, буянил – по полной жёг. Каким был, таким и остался, по-другому не смог. Пожалуйста, положи для меня меня-нового в свой мешок. А я залезу на табуретку и прочту тебе свой стишок...»
«Хулиганил, дразнился, дрался, напивался, буянил – по полной жёг. Каким был, таким и остался, по-другому не смог. Пожалуйста, положи для меня меня-нового в свой мешок. А я залезу на табуретку и прочту тебе свой стишок...»
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government.
from jp