Вчора бачив військового в центрі Києва, котрий просто ліг посереду міста, серед людей і кричав. Він не був п'яним, він не був під чимось, він був с друзями. Ми підійшли спитати, чи потрібна допомога.
Нам відповіли, що у людини просто важкий психичний стан і що військовий пробув довго на передку і що спробують своїми силами довести додому.
Вчора бачив військового в центрі Києва, котрий просто ліг посереду міста, серед людей і кричав. Він не був п'яним, він не був під чимось, він був с друзями. Ми підійшли спитати, чи потрібна допомога.
Нам відповіли, що у людини просто важкий психичний стан і що військовий пробув довго на передку і що спробують своїми силами довести додому.
Ось у нього я б спитав, чи є бог, а не у попів
BY усрусія ✞
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The Russian invasion of Ukraine has been a driving force in markets for the past few weeks. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from jp
