𝐒 𝐄 𝐌 𝐎 𓅟

𝐒 𝐄 𝐌 𝐎 𓅟

𝐒 𝐄 𝐌 𝐎 𓅟 Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Official government accounts have also spread fake fact checks. An official Twitter account for the Russia diplomatic mission in Geneva shared a fake debunking video claiming without evidence that "Western and Ukrainian media are creating thousands of fake news on Russia every day." The video, which has amassed almost 30,000 views, offered a "how-to" spot misinformation. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
𝐒 𝐄 𝐌 𝐎 𓅟 from jp

𝐒 𝐄 𝐌 𝐎 𓅟𝐿𝐼𝑉𝐼𝑁𝐺🜮┊𝒃𝒆𝒏𝒈𝒉𝒂𝒛𝒊 𝒍𝒊𝒃𝒚𝒂𖤊

𝒃𝐸 𝑀𝑌 𝑆𝑇𝐴𝑅 𝐴𝑁𝐷 𝐼 𝑊𝐼𝐿𝐿 𝒃𝐸 𝑇𝐻𝐸 𝑆𝐾𝑌 𝐹𝑂𝑅 𝑌𝑂𝑈𖤴

𝐴𝐺𝐸🜧┊³¹ 𝒐𝒄𝒕𝒐𝒃𝒆𝒓 ₂₀₀₁


.☆ @C4_a4 ☆.

Open Telegram