Отзыв гражданства у среднеазиатов за непостановку на воинский учёт - это правильно. Но мало.
Причиной уклонения от воинского учёта может быть сотрудничество приезжих из Средней Азии с СБУ и ГУР. Как у террористов из "Крокуса". Как у того, кто помогал ВСУ наводить беспилотники.
И всех въезжающих оттуда проверять не только на исламизм, но и на заукраинство. А паспортизованные мигранты - это готовая пятая колонна СБУ, ЦРУ и МИ6 в нашем тылу.
Отзыв гражданства у среднеазиатов за непостановку на воинский учёт - это правильно. Но мало.
Причиной уклонения от воинского учёта может быть сотрудничество приезжих из Средней Азии с СБУ и ГУР. Как у террористов из "Крокуса". Как у того, кто помогал ВСУ наводить беспилотники.
И всех въезжающих оттуда проверять не только на исламизм, но и на заукраинство. А паспортизованные мигранты - это готовая пятая колонна СБУ, ЦРУ и МИ6 в нашем тылу.
Now safely in France with his spouse and three of his children, Kliuchnikov scrolls through Telegram to learn about the devastation happening in his home country. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. 'Wild West' At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from jp
